Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Paying student government officials
“It takes a lot of energy, and it takes a lot of time,” Wood said. “The job is a lonely one. You’re taking a full-time job without pay.”
The fact is, about 80 percent of private universities compensate their student government officers with some sort of stipend or scholarship, according to Executive Director Butch Oxendine of the American Student Government Association, which compiles data on student governments nationwide.
Xavier University in Cincinnati, Ohio, gives its Student Government Association president about $5,000 a year, which Oxendine said adds up to "pennies on the hour" considering the 40 plus number of hours she puts in per week. Northeastern University in Boston gives its Student Government Association a full tuition waiver and meal plan that adds up to about $24,000.
Compensation opens up the playing field because "otherwise, you just have rich kids running (because) it limits the pool you can draw from," Oxedine said. Many students might not be able to run for their student government because the time commitment would not allow them to work.
Oxendine said compensation for being active in one's student government is about the equivalent of athletes getting scholarships or newspaper staff members getting stipends. The Daily does offer small stipends to staff members who work at least twice a night.
—ALICE TRUONG
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
Elections committee confirmed
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Group executive accountability bill passed with continuing debate over SAFB accountability
At the end of the night, the original bill presented to Senate — only to create group executive accountability — was passed. Another vote was taken in order to permanently write the bill's protocol into ASG guidelines instead of having the bill take effect for only two years, as all ASG bills do. A two-thirds majority is needed to change ASG guidelines.
A proposed legislative order by Will Upton to require SAFB to similar accountability rules failed to meet a two-thirds majority, with only 58 percent of Senate for the order. Upton suggested SAFB use the same bill, revised in ways to fit the board, such as changing the questions student group leaders would answer.
SAFB members debated vehemently against such a move. The order to require the financial vice president draft something similar to what the executive committee has presented made the board defensive. Members see the idea of improving accountability important, but thought it was unfair to make SAFB do something it hasn't discussed yet whereas the executive committee has had several weeks to create and revise its bill before presenting to Senate.
"I think it's unfair to ask us to take the same bill and change the questions and not have us discuss it within the committee," board member Cassie Witten said.
Weinberg freshman Jonathan Green, one of the group executive accountability bill's authors, said there was enough flexibility for SAFB by altering the questionnaire that would be used to gather feedback from student group leaders. Before the legislative order was presented, Witten argued against using the same form, but said she would like to see the questions changed to include other aspects, such as professionalism of account executives.
ASG President Jon Webber said that when he was talking to more than 20 A-status group leaders, accountability was a big theme that emerged from discussions to improve or change the way SAFB and A-status funding cycle work.
Furthermore, the board did not like the idea of making such information public because of fear of backlash from student groups who resented not get the amount of money requested from the board during the spring funding cycle.
"I think it's limiting," Financial Vice President Seva Rodnyansky said of the legislative order. "Those comments (from student group leaders) would be colored by money and funding."
There is also information about SAFB that members argued to stay within the closed committee. Bogusz argued that presenting the SAFB accountability information to Senate was important.
"The question is whether or not this information should come to you (senators)," he said. "That's assuming the groups we're dealing with are stupid, uninformed and don't deserved to be listened to. We're not here to protect people in our committees. You should all have the information for every committee for which you authorize."
The legislative order to apply the bill's theme to SAFB has failed, but senators hinted that a similar bill might reappear, perhaps for the fourth week in a row.
—ALICE TRUONG
NU Link shuttle poll results in
The ASG external relations committee first took interest in creating a weekend downtown shuttle when the Student-Community Relations Taskforce met in the fall and believed there was a connection between excessive alcohol consumption and the lack of entertainment in Evanston. From its meeting with university services, the committee has found the cost per quarter to operate a Saturday shuttle for eight hours (from 12 p.m. to 10 p.m. with a two-hour gap) to cost $6554.80. The committee expects 25 students to use the shuttle on a one-way trip, which would cost make the cost per passenger $3.28. This cost per trip is higher than using the El, and so the committee would like the university to contribute funding so students wouldn't have to pay more to use the proposed shuttle. The committee also wants to run a test pilot program as early as spring.
The following was taken from the report:
ASG is discussing whether or not operating an Intercampus Shuttle to Chicago on Saturdays would be beneficial for students. Currently, students wishing to visit Chicago on weekends must resort to other forms of public transportation, and in January the CTA is prepared to increase train fares for the El up to $3.25 per ride. Your responses to this short poll will help us decide if we should pursue operating an Intercampus on Saturdays.
2481 responses to the poll as of 2008-02-19 10:49.
- Would you use the intercampus if it were offered on Saturdays?
Yes - 98.47%
No - 1.53%- How many times a quarter do you go into Chicago on Saturday?
0 - 3.55%
1-2 - 23.98%
3-4 - 36.11%
5+ - 36.36%- How many times a quarter would you use a Saturday?
0 - 1.98%
1-2 - 13.74%
3-4 - 36.28%
5+ - 48%- Would you go into Chicago more often if it were offered on Saturdays?
Yes - 98.39%
No - 1.61%- Please check times for which you would like an inbound route (to Chicago):
12 pm - 80.13%
2 pm - 82.31%
4 pm - 77.27%
6 pm - 75.65%
8 pm - 62.19%
10 pm - 47%- Please check times for which you would like an outbound route (from Chicago):
1 pm - 36.44%
3 pm - 53.53%
5 pm - 73.4%
7 pm - 78.19%
9 pm - 84.04%
11 pm - 84.6%
1 am - 74.2%- What is the maximum you would be willing to pay per one-way ride?
$0 - 14.79%
$1 - 30.35%
$2 - 42.89%
$3+ - 10.8%- It is possible that a Saturday could stop at other Chicago locations besides the Ward Building. Please select the attractions in Chicago where you would like the bus to stop:
Navy Pier - 52.16%
Millenium Park - 76.62%
North Michigan Avenue (Water Tower) - 75.17%
South Michigan Avenue (Wrigley Building, Riverfront) - 45.55%
Museum Campus (Field Museum, Adler Planetarium, Shedd Aquarium) - 66.38%
Other attractions: (write-in) - 11.21%
—ALICE TRUONG
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Saving $45,000: where ASG decided to cut and spend
With the 2008-09 budget set at $43,000, the saved $45,000 will mean more money for student groups.
“Hopefully this will improve programming across campus,” Associated Student Government President Jon Webber said.
The largest decrease came from the removal of Associated Student Government student legal services, decreasing $35,000 from the budget, which was used to pay for the salary of the lawyer. The biggest expense in the upcoming budget is paying for ASG-related expenses for Martin Luther King Jr. Day celebrations, costing $20,000.
Webber, a Weinberg senior said that though the current 2007-08 budget is set at $88,000, only about $20,000 has been spent. Much of the savings also included scaling back the budget to what is actually used. For example, ASG allocated $6,000 to spend on copier maintenance for the current year, but Webber said the full amount wasn’t being used. The copier budget has been decreased to $3,500. The Senate retreat was scaled back from a couple thousand dollars to $500 because the retreat will remain on campus.
While many cuts were made in the upcoming budget, several increases were also made.
The fall activities fair’s budget was increased from $4,500 to $6,000 for next year because of increased student turnout and demand. A new “senate project pool” of $5,000 was created for the upcoming year.
“One of my biggest frustrations of the year is that I didn’t set my own budget,” Webber said. “I’m setting the budget for the next person.”
The pool will allow ASG president as well as executive board members and senators to access the funds so long as Senate approves a petition from the people requesting to spend the amount. Because the pool is new to ASG, the amount of money available is set to be small.
“It’s big enough to make a difference, but not big enough to be ridiculous,” he said. “It would allow them to have things on their priority list or agenda.”
Money that wouldn’t be used from the pool would be rolled back to the body. The $43,000 budget includes $1,200 for office supplies; $6,100 for capital technology, including copier maintenance; $9,200 for special events, including the fall and winter activities fairs; $1,500 for Student Activities Finance Board and the executive committee expenses; $20,000 for Martin Luther King Jr. Day programming and $5,000 for the senate project pool.
The following is the report sent out to senators:
2008-2009 ASG Operating Budget Total: $43,000
Office Supplies $1,200
This money will go toward general office supplies for the ASG office and does not include costs associated with the student group printer/copier or the office supplies for the Student Legal Services office. Items include staplers, pens, pencils, paper clips, binders, page protectors, tape, file folders, Post-its, white-out, three-hole puncher, scissors, etc.
Capital Technology $6,100
Copier $3,500
Included in this line item are any charges associated with the student group copier including monthly rental service, paper, toner, staples, and any charges for repairs and/or service calls. Additionally, this line item will cover any costs associated with copying materials at the copy center that are not included in the special events or marketing line items.
Technology $2,000
These funds are to be used for the purchase, maintenance, repair and service of ASG-owned technology equipment. This includes the fax machine, computers, telephone lines, software, printers, etc., but does not include the student group copier. Also includes any lockdown or antitheft measures for the technology.
Sight, Sound, and Seating $600
This line item is to be used for A/V and set up charges associated with Senate meetings, ASG election debates, ASG info sessions, and any other sort of town hall meetings. Any A/V and set up charges incurred for other events will come from the special events line item.
Special Events $9,200
Senate Retreat $500
This will be used to pay for any costs incurred for Senate retreat including venue charges, A/V charges, printing of senator handbooks, and binders for the event.
Fall Activities Fair $6000
This covers venue charges, tent rentals, A/V charges, room setup or other equipment fees, printing of material for handbooks, and any other necessary materials for the Fall Activities Fair.
Winter Activities Fair $500
This covers venue charges, A/V charges, room setup or other equipment fees, printing of material for handbooks, and any other necessary materials for the Winter Activities Fair.
LAB $2000
This covers venue charges, A/V charges, room setup or other equipment fees, printing of material for handbooks, name tags, and any other necessary materials for the Leadership Advisory Board.
Big Bite Nite $200
This money will cover any costs associated with Big Bite Nite including transportation costs, table rentals and any other supplies needed for the execution of the event.
SAFB/ Executive Committee Expenses $1,500
This line item is to be used for any expenses related to the operations of the SAFB/ Executive Committee including student group audits, account executive binders, funding cycle printed materials and annual review supplies. Also, includes costs for co-sponsorship forums.
Martin Luther King Day $20,000
This line item covers all ASG related expenses for the Martin Luther King Day Celebrations. This is specifically for honorariums traditionally requested in the spring term.
Senate Project Pool $5,000
This line will not be able to be used unless the ASG Senate approves a petition from the ASG President & Executive Board to spend a portion of the line for a project.
—ALICE TRUONG
New senator SAFB member
The event was not nearly as elaborate as when Rodnyansky was confirmed when Speaker of the Senate Jesse Garfinkel swore him in over a B-status funding guide earlier this month.
—ALICE TRUONG
The leaner, meaner ASG budget
More to come.
—ALICE TRUONG
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Week 8's Senate agenda
Senators will also discuss senator accountability measures and there will be a discussion of increasing communication between constituents and senators.
—ALICE TRUONG
UBPC recruits help of ASG committees
UBPC, made up of six members, will present four recommendations: wireless Internet on campus, 24-hour study spaces, downtown Chicago Saturday shuttle and renovations to the ground floor of Norris University Center. These issues were gathered from an open December poll in which students listed services they would like to have at Northwestern. A more recent poll posted in early February asked students to rate what the four recommendations.
Several of the recommendations on the priorities list are issues that members of Associated Student Government have been working on themselves. For example, Kate Pascale's external relations committee has been working with university services to create a weekend downtown Chicago shuttle. The committee also put up a poll recently, asking students about what their usage of such a proposed shuttle would be like. UBPC chairwoman Jessica Wash said that she has been collaborating research with Pascale and the external relations committee, and the committee poll results were shared with UBPC.
ASG Academic Vice President Anna Xu's academic committee's wireless subcommittee has been working with Northwestern University Information Technology to see the feasibility of wireless. The results of a recent meeting with NUIT seem good, said Anna Xu who said it is her goal to have wireless in all the dorms by this upcoming Fall Quarter. The academic subcommittee has also worked with UBPC with its research. It has found that 58 percent, or 11, of 19 comparable (in terms of size and status) Consortium on Financing Higher Education institutions have wireless Internet in their dorm. NU falls in line with the eight universities that don't have wireless Internet in their dorms.
Wireless Internet has been a reoccurring UBPC recommendation since 2001, Wash said. Since then, the university has made certain steps toward a wireless campus with its first Virtual Private Network set up in 2002. Last year, students ranked wireless Internet first in the 2007 UBPC poll. Because wireless Internet was packaged with improving cell phone coverage, the university focused on the latter to increase communication options in wake of the Virginia Tech shooting in April.
The other two options include less involvement on the part of ASG members, although it should be noted that the ASG president is an honorary member in the committee, and the recently retired ASG financial vice president Aneesa Arshad is part of the committee as well.
Some interesting points to be made about the other two recommendations:
- In her report about Norris renovations, Arshad said the suggestion to change the ground floor can be traced back to the ASG president from 1984. A quote from last year stated that completely overhauling Norris with new furniture and a new kitchen area would cost $6 million to $8 million. To renovate the ground floor area that doesn't include the kitchen would cost about $2 million less. However, these numbers are a year old and vary with contractors, Arshad said.
- Of US News and World Report's list of national institutions, 18 of the top 20 universities have 24-hour spaces. NU is one of two that doesn't have such a space. A note to keep in mind is that during the Fall Quarter, library hours were extended after UBPC proposed the change last year. At the beginning of Winter Quarter, university and dining officials were thinking of scaling back the University Library's Plaza Cafe hours because not enough students were using them.
—ALICE TRUONG
Monday, February 18, 2008
Still confused about SAFB?
The arm of ASG some hope to change
Aneesa Arshad held one of the most – if not the most – powerful student positions on campus.
As the former Associated Student Government financial vice president, the SESP senior oversaw a board that doled out about $1.2 million to student groups last spring.
Last Wednesday, her reign came to an end.
“I’ve learned a lot,” she said to the Senate as the outgoing financial vice president. “It’s sad to go, but change is good.”
Yet questions loom as to what change will come in Arshad’s place.
The change starts with her successor, Weinberg junior Seva Rodnyansky who is making sure the Student Activities Finance Board will be ready for spring funding.
Right now, Rodnyansky is working on transitioning to the position. Despite having been part of the board since Fall Quarter during his freshman year, he said “there’s always more to learn because it’s a constantly evolving process.”
And if ASG President Jon Webber has his way, the funding process could change more than anyone in SAFB would expect.
Weeks before B-status group funding took place Feb. 13, the Weinberg senior was already thinking of ways to change spring funding for A-status groups which in a time-honored tradition has kept tired senators and student group leaders in a cramped Norris room for many hours.
The board oversees funding for A-status groups, on-campus groups that are typically more established and require more funding. It prepares for the largest event of the year with a set of recommendations in a 60-hour auditing and interviewing process. During the process and throughout the year, the board follows a strict protocol of monthly audits, weekly petition and numerous applications. Some see this process as too rigid, but SAFB members say this is crucial for student group accountability. The board is responsible for the $44 student activities fee every student pays each quarter.
“At the end of the day, this is students’ money,” Arshad said. “And if there weren’t so many rules and procedures, I think people would feel nervous that every cent isn’t being held accountable.”
Webber has yet to announce the funding changes, pending further discussion with Rodnyansky, who has held the office of financial vice president for less than a week now. Webber has talked to over 20 A-status groups’ leaders and compiled pages upon pages of notes in a Word document. He said there are emerging themes from these complaints and suggestions that could potentially alter, or even encourage a major overhaul of, the process, the protocol and the institution.
With an arm of ASG that is potentially more powerful than the body itself, compiled of six senators and six non-senators, there is a sense of division and friction. Members of the board go into Senate meetings, dressed like career-oriented men and women, occupying a corner of the room and focused on their laptops. But the greatest tension stems from who has the final say at the end of funding.
Senators, who act as a check to the board by debating the funding recommendations, have an amendment pool of about $20,000 during spring funding that they can allocate to the student groups. But most the time, senators pass almost all of the recommendations.
“This is one of the most important things that Senate does,” Arshad said. “And there’s a little bit of tension because (funding) is something that’s supposed to be ultimately up to the senators, but because we put so much time and have so much knowledge (having audited these groups), we actually – I think a lot of people would agree – have more power in the process.”
Even within the board, with members who might be friends, debates are heated.
“At committee, we go at each other 10 times more than people go at each other in Senate,” Arshad said. “We tear each other apart.”
But there are no hard feelings – such debate is crucial to the board’s effectiveness, Arshad said.
“If we’re not debating, and we don’t really disagree, then we’re not doing our job,” she said.
This is all before they make their recommendations. These internal divisions don't make a difference when recommendations are finalized. When the board presents the funding recommendations, it presents them as one board.
Relations between the board and student groups most obviously become strained during the funding process because “there’s never enough money to go around,” Arshad said.
Unhappy groups can mobilize and bring a number of members to the Senate meeting to debate funding. While a group might try to get the largest slice from the senate’s discretionary pie, Arshad said outsiders’ presence sometimes signals student group disapproval of the board.
As the newest financial vice president, Rodnyansky is face of SAFB. Even though he has his own set of goals to bring in change, he, like Arshad did, will face difficulties – not from outsiders, but from the position itself. It’s a difficulty that Webber, in his quest to change the board, will have to deal with as well.
“Each financial vice president has goals … But it’s just so overwhelming the things you have to do day to day,” Arshad said. “There are things I wanted to do that I couldn’t.”
—ALICE TRUONG
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Jam packed ASG meeting in summary
- Seva Rodnyansky was unanimously confirmed as the new financial vice president — sworn in with a not-so-elaborate ceremony with one hand in the air and the other on a B-status funding packet.
- Flicker was de-recognized, with 60 percent of the votes concurring with the committee decision.
- Brown Sugar was denied its $100 request with 77 percent of votes.
- The group executive accountability bill was motioned with 71 percent of the votes.
- The Northwestern Gender Protection Initiative bill was passed with 80 percent in favor.
Gender Initiative bill passed
New FVP sworn in
In an impromptu ceremony in a filled ASG meeting of senators and student group members, Senate Speaker Jesse Garfinkel swore in the new financial vice president over the B-status funding recommendations packet.
"I want to thank Senate, ASG exec, my board for making this a pleasurable experience," current Financial Vice President Aneesa Arshad said. "I've learned a lot. It's sad to go, but change is good."
Today's meeting is the last session the SESP senior will act as financial vice president.
—ALICE TRUONG
B-Status Funding meeting begins
The second annual B-Status group funding is organized by the Executive Committee, headed by Executive Vice President, Matt Bogusz. This funding cycle, which always occurs during the Winter Quarter, will fund groups that are less established or can carry their activities without much help from ASG.
-Paul Takahashi
B-status funding in less than 5 hours
Monday, February 11, 2008
Plaza Cafe hours still intact, possible airport shuttles, publicity guidelines re-evaluated
After Associated Student Government President Jon Webber met with officials from university dining services, they decided to keep the hours open for another quarter. The library cafe's hours were extended to 2 a.m. Sunday to Thursday for the first time during Fall Quarter because of ASG lobbying.
"It's been a long priority of ASG to keep library hours extended very late," the Weinberg senior said.
In the Student-Community Relations Task Force report that was released last month, the task force identified the creation of "third spaces," or space for students to socialize during late-night weekends, as a priority. The current Undergraduate Budget Priorities Committee also lists 24-hour study spaces as a possible recommendation.
"We are trying to do everything we can to make sure library hours are utilized, so hours aren't shortened," Webber said.
As a part of the extended- hours agreement, ASG publicized the cafe hours through listserv e-mails last week.
The cafe was deemed to have low usage last quarter by the number of register transactions, Webber said. The hours for the cafe will be re-evaluated at the end of the quarter.
Webber is also talking with University Services about the feasibility of creating a shuttle before and after breaks to transport students to the airport. If established, the shuttle would probably run the last two days of the quarter and the day before classes started, he said.
The ASG executive board has also been working with University Services about a possible weekend Chicago shuttle. The committee is polling student support for the proposal on NU Link, asking students when they'd like the shuttle to run, how much they'd be willing to pay and what shuttle stops they would use in downtown Chicago.
In addition, ASG and university officials will re-evaluate publicity guidelines on campus. Webber said he has gathered feedback from about 40 student group leaders through an e-mail questionnaire about how they publicize events and what they'd like to see.
"We're taking a look at how successful current methods are," he said.